We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees utilize.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Lady tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.

The loads of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made apparent that police is free to consider action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-subject duties inside the interim period. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Just a few years back, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming activity, requiring people today to search through print copies of case regulation, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case law search possibilities, and a lot of sources offer free access to case legislation.

PLR is actually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

However it can be made very clear that police is free to choose action against any person who's more info indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain respect on the family lose in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security of the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is obtained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that while taking into consideration the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to look at the merit of many of the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who are found to generally be most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked because of the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make sure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The Cornell Legislation School website offers various information on legal topics, together with citation of case regulation, and even supplies a video tutorial on case citation.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple experienced two youthful children of their individual at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had young children.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Criminal cases From the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil legislation systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decrease courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.